In this paper, three assembly balancing methods were studied: largest Candidate Rule (LCR),. Kilbridge and Wester (KWC), and Ranked Positional Weight. KILBRIDGE & WESTER METHOD. Problem 2: The following list defines the precedence relationships & element times for a new model toy: Element. 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. EXAMPLE 3: Kilbridge and Wester Method Apply the Kilbridge and Wester method to Example Problem 1. ‘ TABLE 4: Work Elements Assigned to Stations.
|Published (Last):||8 February 2009|
|PDF File Size:||16.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here This RPW value is 3. However, the practical realities of the line balancing problem may not permit the realization of this number. Steps 2 and 3 result in the assignment of elements 2, 5, 1, and 4 to station 1.
6.5 METHODS OF LINE BALANCING
Posted 12 days ago. In general, the Kilbridge and Wester method will provide a superior line balancing solution when compared with the largest-candidate rule. However, our problem is elementary enough that many of the difficulties which the procedure is designed to solve are missing.
The sum of the T e values for the columns is helpful because we can see how much of the cycle time is contained in each column. Get homework help anytime, anywhere! For large balancing problems, involving perhaps several hundred work elements, these manual methods of solution become awkward.
The reader can see that the trend will be toward lower values of RPW as we get closer to the end of the precedence diagram. Element 3 is not feasible because its immediate predecessor is element I, which has not yet been assigned, The first feasible element encountered is element 2.
To methos elements to workstations, start with the column I elements. Transtutors is the best place to get answers to all your doubts regarding the Kilbridge Wester heuristic and steps in line balancing with examples. The possible combinations of primes 17, 2 and 2 of work content time 68 min are as kilbrdge.
For convenience, include the T e value and immediate predecessors for each element. Largest-candidate rule This is the easiest method to understand. Learn how to solve the Rubik’s Cube with the easiest method. In this heuristic, work element is selected as per its position in precedence diagram. The column II elements would be considered next.
Constraint the precedence diagram so that nodes representing work elements of identical precedence are arranged vertically in columns. These methods are heuristic approaches, meaning that they are based on logic and common sense rather than on mathematical proof.
Element 6 is the only one that can be entered. We begin the assignment process by considering elements at the top of the list and working downward. Posted 11 days ago. Copy and paste your question here Then, the elements are assigned to work stations in the general order of their RPW values.
The total of their element times is 1. The elements at the front of the diagram are selected first for entry into the solution. None of the methods guarantees an optimal solution, but kilbridfe are likely metjod result in good solutions which approach the true optimum.
In the following section we survey some of these computerized kilbrldge. Posted 13 days ago.
However, this is not always true, as demonstrated by our sample problem. Notify me of new comments via email.
METHODS OF LINE BALANCING | CuikSuiqbad RekaDayaUpaya